POWERS #14
Author: Stephen Gerding
November 2nd, 2005
I’m a fan of POWERS. Really, I am. I’ve been buying it from the first Image issue, I have the first 4 trades and plan to buy the rest eventually. But as of this, issue #14 of the Icon era, I’m done with the regular issues. For $3.95, I’m treated to yet more crappy stand-up/spoken word intermissions throughout the book. There are double page spreads that are either hard to follow because they aren’t laid out obviously enough for your eye to instinctively follow, or the word balloons are split across the crease so you have to slow down just to figure out what’s being said. This issue’s lettering is, without a doubt, the worst, most pixelated lettering I’ve seen in the title to date. Seriously people, there’s absolutely no good reason for the lettering to pixelate. I do graphic design for a living - page layouts, logo design, the whole nine, and if I ever gave a client a final product that looked like this issue, I’d be lucky to recieve half payment.
Bottom line: Bendis and Oeming are both amazingly talented creators who made their names and careers on POWERS. Unfortunately, the title seems to have become a casualty of their success. I’m flipping through my Image TPBs right now, and typos aside, the general quality of the art and writing is so much higher, it’s shameful. The basic plotlines being explored right now in the series are genuinely good stuff. But the actual execution really feels like an afterthought, the book itself seems slapped together in an afternoon rather than something someone’s spent time on, and for $3.95 an issue, we deserve more. If the collections are more reasonably priced, I’ll consider continuing on with the book, but as of right now, I’m going cold turkey on what was once one of my absolute favorite series. And that sucks.
- Related Articles:
10 Responses to “POWERS #14”







November 2nd, 2005 at 8:35 pm
In the last issue, the “stand-up” routine at least had some thematic relationship to the story, as I recall. This time it was just Bendis complaining about his internet-based detractors.
And as a fellow graphic designer, I agree wholeheartedly about the bumpy fonts. WTF? It’s been going on for a long time. You would think that somebody would have noticed and fixed it by now.
November 2nd, 2005 at 9:17 pm
I’ll re-read the issue in a day or two, but last issue’s intermissions were so annoying I ended up skimming over them this time out. What I read still seemed like ranting about message board posters, though.
As for the font issue, it’s been going on for the entire run as Icon, I think, but with the different sized lettering this issue, it really got under my skin. Completely bush league.
November 3rd, 2005 at 5:36 pm
aparently the 3.95 on the cover was a typo, comic retailers were charged as if the comic would sell for 2.95 retail.
November 3rd, 2005 at 7:16 pm
You know, I can’t decide if this makes it better or worse. The indicia on the inside front cover had a typo too, saying it was issue 13, not 14. Seriously, these types of mistakes and typos are so unprofessional, it’s sad…
November 3rd, 2005 at 8:42 pm
Makes it better or worse? Are you upset over the principle of the thing now? To me, getting refunded a dollar is much better than being charged an extra dollar on purpose.
November 3rd, 2005 at 9:36 pm
I just checked my recipt and see that I was charged under 3 bucks. demand a refund!
November 3rd, 2005 at 11:02 pm
Worse in that it adds to my sense that the title really has become an afterthought that’s slapped together at the last minute with little quality control. If it were an oddity that there were mistakes in the title, it’d be no big deal, but the entire package this time was just so sloppy, it boggles the mind.
November 3rd, 2005 at 11:16 pm
I’m not aware of any comic writer or artist that proofreads the indecia of their own comic. it seems almost a tangetial support of your argument, true that your argument might be, that the quality of the comic has gone down.
November 4th, 2005 at 2:04 am
The indicia typo is a minor symptom of the problem the entire issue exemplifies. Typo on the price, amateurish lettering quality, layouts that are becoming more difficult to decipher, poorly planned and executed double page spreads, meandering meta-commentary on message board ettiquette - it all gelled together this issue. Any one of these things on it’s own I have no problem writing off. Even a couple of them showing up semi-regularly I was able to handle for a long time. But when they all come together in one big mess, it’s more than I’m willing to overlook. Bottom line is, if the people putting the book out don’t care about the quality of their final product, I’m done spending my money on it. It doesn’t bother you, that’s great! As for me, I’ll get my Bendis and Oeming fix elsewhere, on projects that I can tell that they still care about, and maybe I’ll get the next Powers TPB if the price is right.
November 4th, 2005 at 11:22 am
I can’t speak about the quality of the issue itself but typos like the wrong price and the wrong issue number are pretty astonishing. I’m going to give Marvel the benefit of the doubt and say it’s probably because there are too few people over there trying to do too many things, but still, they are a publisher, and I agree with Steve — one could interpret this lack of attention to detail as overall disinterest, which for a company like Marvel that relies on creative output, can be deadly (see: current Disney).