Nerding Out About Indiana Jones 4
Author: AF Duncan
January 18th, 2007
So, in the midst of all the recent hubbub about a fourth Indiana Jones movie, an uncharacteristically chatty George Lucas blurted out the following enigmatic quote about the new film’s premise:
“I discovered a McGuffin. I told the guys about it and they were a little dubious about it, but it’s the best one we’ve ever found. … Unfortunately, it was a little too ‘connected’ for the others. They were afraid of what the critics would think. They said, ‘Can’t we do it with a different McGuffin? Can’t we do this?’ and I said ‘No.’ So we pottered around with that for a couple of years. And then Harrison really wanted to do it and Steve said, ‘Okay.’ I said, ‘We’ll have to go back to that original McGuffin and take out the offending parts of it and we’ll still use that area of the supernatural to deal with it.’”
So, what the hell is he talking about? What could this object be? I’ve mulled it over for like five seconds, and really the only things you can infer are that the object is probably ancient and that it’s obviously controversial in some way. I’m going to guess it’s also got some solid pulp-ish elements — it’s magic-y or whatever — and the very idea of it resonates much like Moses’ commandment tablets and the holy grail.
Will these guys rock the Old Testament again? Or something from another ancient civilization? Something from East Asia maybe…? If the story is set in the early-mid 50s (just a guess), maybe the North Korean army replace Nazis as the baddies, which I guess would be kind of timely, controversial, and a thematic fit with the other three movies. Then again, they could skip all that and go after Excalibur or something along those lines. What historically exotic/adventurous part of the world wasn’t in the first three movies? Anyone got any ideas?

- Related Articles:
7 Responses to “Nerding Out About Indiana Jones 4”







January 18th, 2007 at 11:48 am
Maybe it’s George Lucas’ marbles?
January 18th, 2007 at 12:22 pm
Yeah, I’m hoping there’s someone who’ll be blunt and honest with Lucas on this one. You know, a person who’ll say “Dude, you don’t want to do that.”
January 18th, 2007 at 12:33 pm
“Connected” probably means Lucas found some weirdass way to link Han Solo to Indy as some great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great grandson who travels back in time to save the world.
Or not.
January 18th, 2007 at 1:06 pm
I’m thinkin’ Jesus.(I mean, the Holy Grail was Jesus-related, but people think of it as a King Arthur thing. Something REALLY Jesus-like… which would explain Spielberg’s reluctance, I think.
January 18th, 2007 at 2:41 pm
I definitely see what you’re saying — and I agree about Grail = Arthur — but man I hope it isn’t something that blatant like The Buddha or whatever. No Jewel of the Nile!
February 3rd, 2007 at 7:27 pm
If it’s “controversial”, perhaps it’s The Spear of Longinous, The Shroud of Tourin, or lost scrolls that tells of Jesus’ alleged brother, James… or possibly, a connection to The DaVinci Code?
February 4th, 2007 at 6:51 am
Noooo! Man, I hope they don’t get all Da Vinci code.
Good guesses though! I could see them maybe using the spear, definitely.