Review: “300″
Author: Daniel Brooks
March 14th, 2007
It breaks my heart to say that for once, my beloved Onion was dead wrong: Zack Snyder’s 300, a gleefully violent, aesthetically gorgeous, kick-ass adrenaline-fest of a movie, is among the best comic book adaptations ever.
Based on Frank Miller’s graphic novel about the 300 Spartan soldiers who took on the gargantuan Persian army at the Battle of Thermopylae, 300 is a much welcome depiction of a time when men were men, thirsting for battle, and women loved them for it. It revels in its over-the-top testosterone, cheesy narration, gore and slow-mo, but it’s also deliriously fun, exciting and well-made. Gerard Butler as King Leonidas is particularly charismatic, and only the most jaded moviegoer wouldn’t like his pump-up-the boys speeches.
Zack Snyder may have just made the first great movie of 2007. We can safely say that the film adaptation of Watchmen — Snyder’s next project — is in very capable hands.
KFR Rating: A-
- Related Articles:
6 Responses to “Review: “300″”







March 14th, 2007 at 7:57 am
what was the onion’s review?
I’m really lookin fwd to this movie
March 14th, 2007 at 8:04 am
The jist of it was that the reviwer couldn’t get past the CGI, over-stylized look of the film. As far as I’m concerned, it gave it an otherworldly beauty. Kind of like Sin City — if you found the look of that film to be distracting, you might feel the same way about 300. I didn’t at all.
March 14th, 2007 at 2:32 pm
I’m not saying it’s gay fascist porn. I’m just saying that if a gay fascist went looking for some porn, this might do the job.
March 14th, 2007 at 4:47 pm
Well, people see what they wanna!
March 14th, 2007 at 7:26 pm
drmedula I like the cut of your jib!
March 14th, 2007 at 7:29 pm
drmedula, you’re far from the first person I’ve seen that’s said something like this, so I’m inclined to believe there’s something to it.