How Lucas’ Obsession With Special Effects Killed STAR WARS
Author: Stephen Gerding
May 15th, 2007
The Guardian has a concise post about how George Lucas’ obsession with making his epic shinier and prettier more or less killed it’s warmth and life. Nothing new, really, as it’s kind of hard for anyone without a vested interest in the Star Wars story to deny that all the rejiggering over the last decade or so has slowly but surely drained the excitement from the marketing juggernaut’s bloated corpse, but this piece is well written enough to be an interesting read.
Thirty years later, the ramifications of this re-emphasis on technological exhibitionism are now apparent. Where the original Lucas trilogy balanced its visual excess with appealing pop culture characterisation - a mythic narrative and numerous cinematic and generic tropes - the recent trilogy, opening with The Phantom Menace (1999), foregoes characterisation and narrative in favour of spectacle alone. Like Jackson’s bloated King Kong (2005) or Verbinski’s interminable Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest (2006), they are vapid confections, eye-candy for a dumbstruck generation intoxicated by CGI.
- Related Articles:
2 Responses to “How Lucas’ Obsession With Special Effects Killed STAR WARS”







May 15th, 2007 at 11:15 am
Heh, nice of him to include the Pirates sequel and King Kong in there. I agree regarding Pirates, but I thought that what killed King Kong was the first hour of the movie, building a romance that never happened.
Ack.
Vic
May 15th, 2007 at 4:05 pm
I actually think the reason Lucas has become all about the effects is because he became BORED with his characters around about the time of RETURN OF THE JEDI- and I can’t really blame him. Spending all those years working your ass off on these, frankly, shallow popcorn movies would probably get to anyone after a while… like a passionate love affair that turns into an unhappy marriage.(It’s probably true of all these other “franchises”, too.)